As the common eroge, but the possible way that it lets unfinished the story or somethings that doesn’t make sense. Criticise plot, character or their development, how each relationship is built, etc… Possibly sex scene too, but not as important as in Nukige Include possible ruining exp, for example Maggot Baits was so gore and repugnant that it was practically unmasturbable and it can be understood Criticise sex scenes and talking about possible fetishes not listed. As a demonstration, I will put some examples appart from the common ones (art, music/sound, voicing, interface, playablity) on what to criticise or comment based on its goal: Other things than that are genre specific, and should be taken as a matter of fact in order to proceed with the critic of the VN/eroge. Some old games directly has no voice, and can be as good (old higurashi). There’s only a few things that are common between genres and to be criticised and those are: art (drawings), music, voicing and interface (design, commodity) and playability (possible bugs that ruin exp, or any other fact that makes it hard) and even so there’s some exception, for example from a VN from 2000 you may not expect good music/art or good interface design. For example, if i’m going to play the great “Umineko” or “Higurashi” (which are 10/10 non-eroge), why would I just come to comment in their boxes that this game its shit because it has no sex scenes? On the opposite, if i’m playing a Nukige, why would my review going to be “this is just sex and no plot?”. It has a lot of weird stuff that possible no one likes (pissing, scat, rape, etc…) then comment (if not tagged possibly) which “fetishes” has, but don’t try to take it as a weapon to criticise the game because it had other issues.Įach game (conceiving its genre) has its own way to be criticised. You liked the game? Come and why you liked the game. My point is that instead of criticising between us, we should use this commentary box as a resort to help each other, solving issues, leaving less Subjetive possible reviews (trying to think out of our box), and this way everyone will get a more realistic view of how the game is going to be and making us saving time, instead of making our own and very sharped to our disguste/like. If I’m in the mood to fap to a nice eroge, why wouldn’t I choose just a Nukige and know I will be able to do it in a lesser time, while my main VN is being built before its late sex scene? If that Nukige has the fetishes (saying it as a non-obscure tasted person, just BJ, titjob, elf/succubi, POV and possible MC with big weapon) that fullfil my desires, why not simply playing it? I also love a good well built plot that makes me remember the game and theorize, that grabs me in since minute 1, but sometimes, these are just too lazy in the issue of fapping to play for. Which doesn’t like Vanilla once in a while? I also love how you build the love and need to chose carefully and pay attention to the development. I’ve played thousand of VN/erogames with very late sex scenes, or even non-eroge (Higurashi, Umineko, etc…) and I belived most of them to be the best, but Nukiges are just as necessary as good VN. It’s fine tp download it, playing it and then coming and criticise to left a review that is in fact very valuable and which I consider a must in our community, but honestly, if this is Nukige, don’t spect much of just early and continuous sex scenes, possible rape/uncommon fetishes and not relevant history. You don’t like nukiges? Don’t enter and complain about. You really piss me off.Īs simply as it’s. I simply don’t understand people who enter to the comments of a Nukige just to complain about it being a Nukige? 99% of Nukiges can be identified by its image, and if not you still have the tags to secure it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |